Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 6001 - 6020 of 7,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  Wouldn’t there be a U.S. interest in deterring such fraud, reducing private enforcement costs within the United States? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am by Hannah Buxbaum
Justice Scalia begins by quoting Aramco on that presumption: "legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:05 am by Kim Krawiec
United States (theft of honest services) by Christine Hurt. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:39 am by Trey Childress
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled last week in the case of Morrision et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am by Gene Quinn
The Applicants then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has issued the long-awaited decision in the case 08-964 Bilski et.al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, 24 (or 12.7%) of the 2009 securities lawsuit filings involved companies that are domiciled outside the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
The political and constitutional settlement in most European countries is very different from that of the United States and our histories have surely led us to value these interests differently. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by William S. Dodge
Arthur Anderson & Co.); and (3) that acts of Congress should presumptively apply to conduct occurring within or having effects within the United States (Judge Mikva’s view in Environmental Defense Fund v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm by Michael Webster
  The Divisional Court reversed the motion court judge.THE FACTS[6]               The Quiznos franchise system was established in the United States 25 years ago and commenced operation in Canada in 2001. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:13 pm by Gene Quinn
Shortly after State Street the Federal Circuit reaffirmed its decisions in State Street Bank and Alappat in AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Larry Ribstein
  For example, it leaves unprotected US citizens who purchase or sell securities outside the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:49 am by JJS
  Rhode Island is one of nearly half of the United States that does not permit a Chapter 9 filing. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am by James Hamilton
Thus, the Office would be required to provide independent periodic reports to Congress on the state of the financial system. [read post]