Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 6001 - 6020
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2020, 2:48 am
The Supreme Court has handed down Kansas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
SPCA Wildlife Care Center v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
There is no explicit exemption for political speech in either Title 17 of the United States Code (the statutory source of copyright in the United States) or in the Copyright Act in Canada. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The judgment of the Court in Weltimmo s.r.o. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság, Case C‑230/14, October 1, 2015 has significant repercussions for EU and non-EU businesses that operate websites that target residents of a Member State and potentially for the territorial reach of the “right to be forgotten”. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:47 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
," an anti-libel injunction should (a) say, "Defendants ... are enjoined from libelously stating," (b) expressly provide that any criminal contempt prosecutions will be conducted before a jury, and (c) expressly provide that the injunction could not be enforced through threat of confinement for civil contempt. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:52 pm
§ 1101(a)(27)(C)(i)-(iii). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
C. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
R. 5(C). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:46 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment this morning in Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (the Austrian Supreme Court). [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:35 am
NYC's Administrative Code requires court to apply "more stringent requirements" in adjudicating civil rights law allegationsWilliams v New York City Hous. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
R. 1:36-3. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
By Glen C. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
The ED argued that the term 1/2 R(0,m) + R(m) was an essential feature of the invention because it was stated in the description of the parent application as originally filed: “The sum of quantities 1/2 R(0,m) and R(m) is the coning compensation and corresponds to the integration of the second and third terms in equation (2). [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
District Court File, U.S.A. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:50 am
Corp. v Jagger, 2008 NY Slip Op 07987. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:46 am
District Judge Mark Cohen's decision Monday in K.B. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:54 am
Failure to exhaust the available administrative remedy to challenge a determination held a fatal defect in seeking judicial reliefMatter of Connor v Town of Niskayuna, 2011 NY Slip Op 01556, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentA number of police officers submitted applications for membership in the New York State and Local Retirement System. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of the United States seems poised to reach the same result in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
