Search for: "State v. Frame"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 6,713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Mikos v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Cases To Be Argued This Week Joan Biskupic of USA Today writes a very detailed and thorough article on United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 5:07 am
" Medical Society of the State of New York v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:25 pm
In such a case, the time-frame described above (3-5 years) does not apply until the minor turns 18. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
See Vitronics Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:12 pm
Because of numerous Supreme Court decisions, including the 6-3 decision in 2005, in Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:37 pm
The ICA, citing Pono v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 6:03 pm
" If a defendant frames its offer in the form of periodic payments without a corresponding cash offer, where is his point? [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:13 am
Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
Maryland is a two-party state. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
"The seminal case concerning the impact of the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement on an individual's statutory rights under Section 75 of the Civil Service Law is Antinore v State [40 NY2d 6].In Antinore the Court of Appeals held that in the event an individual elects to proceed with a disciplinary proceeding set out in a collective bargaining agreement, he or she may not later claim the right to relitigate the charges under a statutory due process… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
In this case (Towson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:32 pm
(Goodman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:22 am
The court stated that the fact that inventors framed the claims as treatment methods does not render the claims patentable. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
Plaintiff repeatedly stated that he believed that Defendant’s billing practices were fraudulent and . . . . consistently framed these differences as matters of fraud and ethics, rather than routine disagreements about regulatory compliance. [read post]
