Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 8,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Dabit, 547 U.S. 71, 83 (2006) and Proctor v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
Biogen Idec (App. 2006-1643, -1649), on remand from the Supreme Court after Bilski v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
Biogen Idec (App. 2006-1643, -1649), on remand from the Supreme Court after Bilski v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:01 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:21 am
On February 23, 2011, Attorney General Eric Holder stated that the Obama DOJ would not defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA as applied to same-sex married couples. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
The key question was whether the "lawfully made under this title" language of the first sale section refers to items that were physically made in the United States or whether it encompasses copies that were licensed by a United States copyright holder but manufactured abroad. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
Copyright holders argue that the phrase means simply not manufactured in the United States, while importers like Kirtasaeng argue that it means subject to the copyright laws of the United States, as in a manufacturer licensed by the holder of a U.S. registered work. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:15 am
In August of 2011, Public Citizen fired the first shot across the bow in our attempts to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in PLIVA v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:30 pm
09-1039), and Actavis, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:36 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:03 am
In yet another case arising from Operation Durango (a government-run sting that lured hopeful immigrants into "bribing" brokers), the court had sympathy for the applicant who fell for the sting operation, but the court faulted the lawyer's inadequate development of legal theories to challenge the sting and referred the matter to the state bar. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:50 am
They can be attractive to many trademark holders other than complainants who claim a market identity and seek to capture the domain names for themselves. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 12:54 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:31 am
By Jason Rantanen Genetics Institute, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
Delano v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:53 pm
Golan v. [read post]
