Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 2:57 pm
Booker and Gall v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The forum-shopping that has resulted after Chau Chak Wing v Fairfax substantially allowed plaintiffs to evade defendants’ right to a jury trial in several states. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:25 am
V. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Hegna, et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:22 pm
A state law claim is preempted by the Act when (1) the work at issue comes within the subject matter of copyright, and (2) the rights granted by state law are equivalent to the exclusive rights of copyright holders under section 106 of the Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am
Holder (2013). [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:56 pm
In its Macy v Holder decision, the commission stated that “intentional discrimination against a transgender individual because that person is transgender is, by definition, discrimination ‘based on …sex,’ and such discrimination therefore violates Title VII. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Consider three Free Speech Cases the Supreme Court decided in the term that ended this past June: 1) In Holder v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
A recent decision from the California Court of Appeal, Bode v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:21 am
This view was rejected by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body in its panel of 17 March 2000 (EC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:33 am
Super. 158, 164 (App.Div.1967); see United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:24 pm
Such beliefs have provoked powerful resistance in the US to human rights approaches that view the child as an independent rights holder and the state as obligated to proved services and protections that are distinctly child-centred. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:51 pm
Dec. 18, 2009)(per curiam) (Whistleblower case remanded in light of decision, holding in State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Rogers (Ohio State Univ.). [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:13 am
• Regulation 1383/2003 does not fulfil the reasonability standard set forth in GATTArticle V:4. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Supreme Court considered the material support prohibition in Holder v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Holder invalidating the coverage formula for the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance provisions or its upholding of Indiana’s unnecessary and onerous voter ID law in Crawford v. [read post]
