Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 25,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Salazar v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:51 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:58 pm
So if you live in a state that allows medical marijuana or small amounts of marijuana, don’t forget that the feds can still get you. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:01 pm
Sublicense v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
Gee v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
Mastriano v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:00 am
Longanacre v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:32 pm
United States, placing him only one word behind Adam Unikowsky, who spoke 4,185 words in Sveen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:37 am
This week’s Sixth Circuit ruling in Tucker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:30 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:10 am
Part V of the Child Care Act, 1991 states that in any proceedings before the Court the welfare of the child ‘must be the first and paramount consideration’ and that the Court ‘in so far as is practicable, give due consideration, having regard to his age and understanding, to the wishes of the child. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:24 am
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:54 am
" Medellin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Russell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
It undermines a core principle of Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:24 am
It was also a total outlier scenario that bore, at most a tangential connection to the norm, to the general problem facing people who had done everything they could to improve themselves while in prison and prepare themselves for a re-entry into society, where they could live happy, law-abiding lives. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 6:39 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Horton v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 1:21 am
Similarly, in State of Karnataka v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Note: In California, the ACLU has launched a campaign to get elected officials to enact sentencing reform as they strive to resolve the state's budget crisis and implement the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]