Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 28,991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2020, 6:27 am
Quoting the landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am
The IP Watchdog gave an overview of the relevant principles non-profit organisations should bear in mind to avoid consumer confusion.The Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed whether descriptive terms in languages which do not hold official EU language status might still be deemed to give rise to a likelihood of confusion where there is nevertheless a significant population in at least one EU Member State which speaks that language - whether that is Russian in Germany or the Baltic… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Massachusetts and New York provide a valuable blueprint for Connecticut policymakers concerned with reversing the outflow of residents and making Connecticut a more attractive place to live and work. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Kahler v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:14 am
"] From today's decision in State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
" Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.In Memphis Center for Reproductive Health v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In 2001, the US Supreme Court handed down Atwater v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:09 pm
James Sch. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:07 am
In most cases, these types of events are short-lived; power is restored quickly, roads open, cleaning crews clear accidents. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:02 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
Bailey and Timothy Caulfield state, One concern that consistently emerges in relation to obtaining genetic information is the worry that an individual may be discriminated against on the basis of his or her genetic make-up and, specifically, on the basis of a predisposition to a certain condition or disease. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Class V Stockholders Litigation, case number 2018-0816, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The Metro is live blogging the trial. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 1:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 12:03 pm
” Light v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 5:29 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Rambling RooftopsWatson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm
And prior to this year, the court’s last signed decision in July was United States v. [read post]
