Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 6,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Medellin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:23 am
Ayres's September 26 ruling in People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
Second, a larger jury allows for a broader cross-section of people and helps to render a more fair and balanced verdict. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:24 am
Bukowski of Stevens & Lee, were just doing their job as they represented Capital Blue Cross in Grider v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:08 pm
“Under the law as approved, ‘people will be confused,’ Roberts said. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:39 am
The Illinois Court of Appeals overturned a conviction Friday in People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 10:30 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
There is no longer any defense available for these people. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:45 am
But if it is simply a racist website designed to frighten people, it is not a true threat.One possible argument for the website being a true threat would be to analogize it to a burning cross, as in Virginia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
American Red Cross, 2006 WL 406353, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
:We also find reversible error in the trial court's almost continuous interference, during cross examination of the People's witnesses, in defense counsel's exploration of issues relevant to defendant's intent to sell (see People v Canto, 31 AD3d 312 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]; People v Melendez, 31 AD3d 186 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; People v Retamozzo, 25 AD3d 73 [2005]; People… [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:00 am
A Metro Gold Line train from Pasadena derailed at a Highland Park crossing last week after it rammed into a pickup truck injuring six people and pushing many passengers out of their seats. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
V. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:06 am
See The Not-for-the-Truth End Run; The Expertise End Run and People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:29 am
I wrote this blog for TPMCafe's book salon and am cross-posting it here.)Several people in the comments section yesterday questioned my contention that presidential power is not a partisan issue because future Democratic presidents will enjoy the same enhanced authorities that the Bush-Cheney administration has pioneered. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 9:57 am
See Jerrett v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
The Court has now docketed District of Columbia v. [read post]
