Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 6001 - 6020 of 11,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2019, 4:10 am by Lyle Denniston
House of Representatives for states such as California, Florida and New York. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 11:45 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
That immunity, as relevant here, bars most civil lawsuits as well as prosecutions under state criminal law; it does not bar enforcement of federal criminal law. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm
In light of the conflicting judicial opinions, The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a temporary injunction, which is currently barring the NLRB's enforcement of the mandate. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the motion to dismiss and certified an interlocutory appeal. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Two years later, another challenge to the agency fees returned to the Supreme Court, this time brought there by a group of California public-school teachers. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in additional en banc news, the Ninth Circuit is going to consider whether the California State Bar is an arm of the state and thus protected by sovereign immunity from claims for damages by an immunocompromised law student forced t [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
The California public accommodation discrimination ban doesn’t expressly bar political affiliation discrimination, but it has been interpreted quite broadly, and has apparently led to an ACLU lawsuit against a restaurant that excluded a patron for wearing a swastika. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm by Edward A. Fallone
(Arnold) Schwarzenegger, which challenged California’s law prohibiting same sex marriage. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:45 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer-side bar has succeeded in the United States Supreme Court to sustain such provisions. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:23 am by Walter Haines, Esq.
The EEOC stated that the company likely violated:   (a) Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination, and (b) violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which bars employment discrimination based on "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm by David Lat
”Judge Tacha has been a Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, since January, 1986. [read post]