Search for: "UNITED STATES ARMY"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 8,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:20 pm
(The bill also states: “No United States Armed Forces personnel, United States civilian employees, or United States civilian contractor personnel may participate in combat operations in connection with the provision of support” in the Bill, but of course placing U.S. troops at a front-line base enhances the likelihood of a self-defense action.) [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued a Memorandum Opinion on 9 December 2011, in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
It has members throughout the United States that have a tangible interest in this case. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:58 pm
Salon has a piece on United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
Army explicitly to break strikes. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
Army explicitly to break strikes. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
§ 708); use of the United States Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus (18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:50 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:51 am
The other three states, by contrast, have pretty much led the way throughout the current bank failure wave. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:11 am
United States, the 4-1-4 opinion articulated two tests for when a wetland constitutes a water of the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:27 am
In light of United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
Maloney, Litigating Article 32 Errors After United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:06 am
Along with a number of women’s and peace groups conducting advocacy on this issue, Amnesty International USA has drafted an expert statement calling on the U.S. to ensure that this policy has the resources and political buy-in necessary to ensure that it is as robust as possible and its implementation is ensured across the whole of the United States’ considerable foreign policy framework. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Politico is reporting: That 15 personnel were “disciplined” as a result of United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
In its second opinion of the term, CAAF today reversed the Army CCA in United States v. [read post]
