Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
So, for instance, the Ninth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
And gay people can now marry, thanks to a changing climate of opinion, and thanks to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
United States, 136 S. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
Reg. 46,716-843 (Aug. 21, 2007)(to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 1)(the "Final Rules") under his decision in Tafas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm
But he nevertheless identified a number of situations in which a party would have standing to attack the FAA: for example, if the government chose to use FAA-derived information in a judicial or administrative proceeding (as occurred in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
United States, Canales v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
"] The gem of this series of cases is United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
Garcia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
Witt v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Weeks and Tenney v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:39 am
In Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:29 am
Moreover, his votes in the COVID-related cases from this past summer, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:06 am
In the third post of our series on workplace class action issues, this blog posting focuses on the statistical study of class certification rulings throughout the Unites States in 2016. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Both sides agreed that having one provider would probably constitute an “undue burden” under the Supreme Court’s 2016 Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
