Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 6001 - 6020 of 24,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 10:15 am by Gene Quinn
Last week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an important decision that might be easy to overlook. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
  This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around… [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
The details of the complaint remain vague, but Schiff stated that it was filed by an individual in the intelligence community and determined by Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to be credible and a matter of “urgent concern. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House of the Court of Session placed no reliance on the absence of a witness statement. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
” Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9:9 (Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim ) (2010). [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
  Can the United States be that far behind? [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am by Gordon Ahl
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, which reawakened Commerce Clause review of federal legislation yet hardly ushered in a new era of robust judicial review; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm by Amy Howe
United States and Moda Health Plan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am by Melissa Crow
For example, the government argues that ending DACA would discourage the flow of undocumented migrants to the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Elizabeth Murrill
It contravenes the duly enacted substantive law of the United States. [read post]