Search for: "Young v. State" Results 6001 - 6020 of 8,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
He stated that as he explored his religious identity, first as a boy of high school age and then as a young adult, he felt increasingly drawn to the tenets of Christianity. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:30 am by Monique Altheim
http://t.co/Jwc2W5lN # Making the Business Case for Privacy and Data Security – Companies often view privacy and data security as legal or … http://t.co/GlMs7JwI # Do Not Track Kids Bill Gains Cosponsors – Over the last few weeks, a number of cosponsors have been addedto the Do N… http://t.co/a8SIr4Jz # NZ: Privacy breach on 9000 ACC claims http://t.co/JKBzdUQk # Website operators not liable for third party comments – Spreadbury v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:31 am by John A. Sakson
The genesis of the problem is called a “step down clause”.The New Jersey Supreme Court approved the use of a step down clause in an important decision known as Pinto v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm by Karwan Eskerie
Vejdeland and Others v Sweden (Application no. 1813/07) – Read judgment  “Will both teacher and pupils simply become the next victims of the tyranny of tolerance, heretics, whose dissent from state-imposed orthodoxy must be crushed at all costs? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:43 pm by Ted Folkman
The government disposes of McIntyre’s claims by pointing out that he is an alien who lives outside the United States and that he therefore has no First Amendment rights, citing Kleindienst v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:23 am by John Day
 But finding a jury in this state that will give damages for emotional distress to the parents for caring for a child with an illness and who state they would have rather aborted the child would be a hard sell. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Jeanne Long
  Chief Justice Young wrote a concurrence in the vacation and denial, stating that although criminal defendants have a right to an impartial juryand to a fair trial, the Constitution does not require unconditionally that jurors not discuss the case among themselves before the matter is submitted to them for decision. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin – is a “young woman whose dreams were dashed because of discrimination sanctioned by the state . . . [read post]