Search for: "Blood v. Blood" Results 6021 - 6040 of 7,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
In Gabriele v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 239 A.D.2d 575, the Appellate Division considered the issue.Vincent Gabriele III began working for the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority in 1985. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:15 am by Steve Hall
"There were no fingerprints, no murder weapon, no blood to convict me. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am by Rosalind English
The Court concluded, unanimously, that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents’ express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 That was the year the Court decided Texas v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:23 pm by Miriam Cherry
Thanks to some advice a couple years ago from non-profit guru Norman Silber (Hofstra), I assigned the class Community Blood Bank of Kansas City v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting opinion from Maryland’s highest court just handed down yesterday, Stouffer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
Just one example: Dioxin levels in their blood are three times higher than the national average. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:34 am by sally
MAK and RK v United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights “The taking of blood samples and of intimate photographs of a girl aged nine, without her parents’ consent, violated article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
There was blood on her leg and underneath her pelvic area, and she was unresponsive and not breathing. [read post]