Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 8,126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
The first is a Blakely v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
In Simpson v Alter ;2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ;Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department the Court answers this question: "The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the appellants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
And after taking an extra week to mull over a late-filed supplemental brief, the Court doled out a GVR in the once-relisted Branch Banking and Trust v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
She recognized that such matters are within the authority of the executive branch because they involve decisions on state security and international relations. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
No Intention to Expand or Contract Existing Authority The amended version does have new language expressly stating that the section should not be read to expand or limit “the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
The ruling denies the OWS request for a temporary restraining order.The case is Waller v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
The Appellate Division modified the Prior Order, only to the extent of granting that branch of the Law Firm's motion dismissing Simon's firat counterclaim for legal malpractice (Bender Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP v Simon, 65 AD3d 499 [lst Dept 20091 [the AD Decision]). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
In S.E.C. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
United States – Whether the constitutional freedom of the press, guaranteed by the First Amendment, was subordinate to a claimed need of the executive branch of government to maintain the secrecy of information. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:45 am
Polk County Court and State Office v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:52 am
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:41 am
Watts On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Third, the Court also relisted in Branch Banking and Trust v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
While the report was prepared by the OSC’s Compliance and Registrant Regulation Branch (the Branch) to assist dealers, advisers and investment fund managers in complying with Ontario securities laws, it provides useful guidance for registrants and applicants for registration in all Canadian jurisdictions. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
Smith) rather than a balancing of factors (ie., Sherbert v. [read post]
