Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 6021 - 6040 of 9,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
 § 145, which provides: An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board…may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director in the United States District Court….The court may adjudge that such applicant is entitled to receive a patent for his invention….All the expenses of the proceedings… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
”Lea V., law professor emerita  “I’m very grateful to Cornell LII and its tireless staff for providing free and up-to-date access to the United States Code and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence, plus its US Supreme Court advance sheets provided under its Hermes Project. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:15 am by Daniel Richardson
  The group received the necessary permits from the state and a Resort Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit from the town. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by David Fine
One of the federal contractors has stated that it is confident the contribution was legal under Citizens United, another plans to ask for its donation back, and the commission appears to be split on the issue. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:02 pm
 "The President," it said, "has no intention of releasing any detainees in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am by Ronald Mann
Eventually the case came to the Supreme Court, producing a 2012 decision in Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
 "The President," it said, "has no intention of releasing any detainees in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
When visitors came to the apartment, the defendant or Lockwood hid Nadine. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am by Jack Chin
It is telling that the citations in the footnote to my quoted sentence were to a legal scholar that Justice Thomas also quoted in the same opinion that tends to agree with his view of federal power in Indian affairs, Sai Prakash, and to a Supreme Court opinion that Justice Thomas is rallying against, the lead opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of the Unites States ruled in the 2004 decision of Rasul v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
United States, which held that the Clean Water Act does not regulate all wetlands but did not produce a majority for the governing standard. [read post]