Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 15,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2016, 1:42 pm
Opinions like this one today seem to me the twenty-first century equivalent of trying to figure out how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.The dispositive question is whether the ostensibly independent shareholders of Wynn Resorts are sufficiently independent that they could be expected to decide to sue Steve Wynn, alongside other board members, on behalf of the corporation. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
Luke Maunder (Bristows LLP) reports on the decision which will be interest to anyone who loves color combination trade marks or trying to figure out how to precisely and clearly ring fence the scope of trade mark protection Conference Report: Should you arbitrate FRAND rates? [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
June 13, 2016, was the 50th anniversary of the famous Supreme Court decision in the case of Miranda v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 6:37 am
The opinion in Kurski v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm
However, the 2015 number soared past these figures, with nearly 10,000 individuals benefiting from successful EEOC systemic lawsuits, the most since 2008. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:28 am
And they probably figured that by doing it this way, they could get the publicity out about Mr. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:15 am
Box, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:00 pm
As for the apportionment, no surprise there either, and you can figure out why. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:19 am
Bush v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:36 am
The other interesting thing about this case, Williams v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm
It’s like saying that the Supreme Court could have avoided ruling on the constitutionality of segregation by simply declining to hear Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:50 pm
Cracraft and McMillan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:04 am
USA LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:23 am
The last few months have seen a spree of lawsuits filed against social media companies for allegedly providing material support to terrorists groups, particularly ISIS, by effectively allowing those groups to use their systems. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:05 am
” He also cited Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:33 am
Additional Resources: Allen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:33 am
Additional Resources: Allen v. [read post]
