Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 29,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
Based on these analyses, we observed a trend that both Japanese and Delaware courts have recently placed more weight on the merger price, which is believed to have accelerated the declining trend in number of cases and the level of premiums in the two jurisdictions. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
In the case of Juliana v United States, 21 Americans ranging in age from 11 to 22 filed a claim (Our Children’s Trust) initially in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in 2015 arguing a fundamental right to live in a world with a stable climate system. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:29 am
Privacy Shield invalid in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:57 pm
Privacy Shield), as the transfers at stake in the context of the national dispute leading to the request for preliminary ruling took place between the EU and the United States (“U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:11 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. in which the state alleges that Exxon Mobil deceived investors. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:53 am
Citing its 2016 decision in Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:59 am
That has to be assessed under the substantive underlying Member State law. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
To this, one may point out to what AG Szpunar wrote in the very opening of his Opinion in Ziggo [at [3]; Katpost here], an approach which the CJEU subsequently endorsed:The European Commission, whose opinion appears to me to be shared by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, contends that liability for sites of this type is a matter of copyright application, which can be resolved not at the level of EU law but under the domestic legal systems of the Member… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:02 am
At 10, the authors state that third parties which are not nominal addressees of the FRAND commitment may still "benefit from the Huawei v ZTE negotiation framework". [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada discussed the Act in Dagg v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Florida courts have clearly stated that the “[m]ere acceptance of some compensation benefits . . . is not enough to constitute an election” of remedies. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
United States and Stuart v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.In a virtual reunion marking the Dodd-Frank Act’s 10th anniversary, the Act’s chief architects gathered in home offices and living rooms to celebrate successes, reflect on the current economic crisis, and mull remaining areas of reform. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
