Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6021 - 6040
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
See coverage on FOSS Patents, JUVE Patent, Legal Patent, and the Kluwer Patent Blog - and, of course, the IPKat - for more.Over on Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter commented on the UK Supreme Court's recent "well-reasoned" decision in Secretary of State for Health v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:00 am
This case, Linde et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:09 am
OMS Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:50 am
The dispute, closely followed by state officials, social workers and defendants' rights groups, marks the first time since 1977 that the justices will consider whether rape can be punished by death.... [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Today, in McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:34 am
State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
Regulation ... 44/2001 ... must be interpreted as meaning that an action relating to infringement of a trade mark registered in a Member State because of the use, by an advertiser, of a keyword identical to that trade mark on a search engine website operating under a country-specific top-level domain of another Member State may be brought before either the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered or the courts of the… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
Lane generally prohibits the application of new constitutional rules of criminal procedure in federal habeas review of state-court judgments, the Court's 2008 decision in Danforth v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
Today, it marked that anniversary by taking for argument in the coming Term United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:27 am
See Kason Indus. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
First on the agenda is Quarles v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:45 am
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Court of Justice’s (CJEU) landmark judgment in Pepsico v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (C-281/10P). [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
The Registrar rejected this claim, since a society could use different marks to denote its services.Section 7(5) TMA In relation to “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE”, the Opponent relied on S7(5) TMA, which states that a “trade mark shall not be registered if or to the extent that its use is prohibited in Singapore by any written law or rule of law”. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:34 pm
However, as demonstrated in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Fernandes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
Since the earlier marks had an average distinctiveness, the Board held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.Now it was RCB's turn to appeal. [read post]
