Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 6021 - 6040 of 16,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 8:47 am by Judicial Watch Blog
The two-term governor, at the time a married father of four young boys, was also charged with spending campaign money on personal matters on 10 occasions. [read post]
18 May 2006, 1:56 am
In other words, if you don't visibly participate in the marketplace, your mark has no value and therefore deserves no protection. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:05 pm
(David Morris, WilmerHale) * Royal trade marks in the UK and beyond (Julius Stobbs, Ipulse IP) * Royal memorabilia: posters, mugs and other merchandise (Anna Carboni, Powell Gilbert) * The Wedding on the Screen (Victoria Gaskell, Olswang LLP) * The Wedding and the Newlyweds: privacy preserved, privacy sold (David Hansel, Hansel Henson) * Ambush marketing (Philip Johnson, Queen Mary Intellectual Property Law Institute) * The Wedding and the Fashion Sector… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 7:27 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
However, since the mark did not become “distinctive and famous” until after the infringing business stopped actively using the domain name, the court determined that this was not bad faith, despite being critical of its own opinion on the matter. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:20 am
As was established in his lawsuit, the dive-master on the boat marked Carlock as present, and then traveled to a different spot, where the group dived again and where (again) the dive-master marked Carlock as present. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:01 pm by Breakfield & Associates, Attorneys
Don't Be a Hero: It is important that you receive treatment for your injuries as soon as possible so that you minimize the long term impact of those injuries on your life. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm by Joseph DiCioccio
  The Second Circuit affirmed the denial of the preliminary injunction as it pertained to enforcing the red sole mark against monochromatic all-red shoes, holding that in those cases, without any contrast the red sole did not serve its source-identifying function (and thus couldn’t be a trademark, no matter how much secondary meaning it may have). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:20 am by The Dear Rich Staff
We like the native-art illustration and wonder why the County isn't pursuing copyright infringement claims as well! [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
This problem is not the same as “broker voting,” which has already been repealed on “non-routine” matters and, we hope, will soon be repealed for so-called “routine” matters, such as the election of directors. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
S. 175, 182 (1981) (quoting Chakrabarty, supra, at 308; some internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 12:57 pm by Tom Smith
The message, however, is another matter. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:27 am by Christopher Danzig
As members of this community, it truly is your input that matters most, so I do sincerely appreciate all of it. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:12 am
  The judge goes with the odds, no matter what the defense lawyer has to say about it. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Charon QC
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
20 May 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
He notes: “While sperm and ova matter, they are not the entirety of biology and don’t tell us all we need to know about sex, especially human sex. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Charon QC
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by Charon QC
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by Charon QC
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]