Search for: "People v. Roberts"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 6,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost… [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am
The self-reinforcing “Matthew Effect” described by Robert Merton takes hold: to those who already have much, more is given. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
’ Generally only idle people, pursuing ‘idle curiosity’ have time to visit court rooms in person. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
I hear them in the voice of my Constitutional Law professor, Robert Bork, and in the words of John Hart Ely, whose scholarly elaboration of the logic of Footnote Four in Democracy and Distrust posed the most cogent challenge to the Court’s expansive constitutional decisions in the realm of reproductive autonomy. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm
Several people who read my submitted statement found Michael’s material as fascinating as I did, so I have added it to my less-than-five-minute opener. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 6:06 pm
This may explain, for example, why Justice Robert decided– in his Hague v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm
See City of Columbia v Costle, 710 F2d 1009, 1013 (CA 4, 1983). [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
In my experience of discussing the law of product-by-process claims with a large number of people, it is important to have in mind the right kind of claim. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
People who immerse themselves in the Constitution and its traditions often bring the concepts of that tradition to bear in their other moral and political judgments. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
How many people, including judges, were aware of his harassment? [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
