Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 178,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
The Court also granted plaintiff’s request as to agreements concerning biguanides, which is “in the class of compounds that includes metformin, the active ingredient” in plaintiff’s patented drug. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:40 pm
Recently, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case involving a defendant grocery store’s claim that it could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because it did not have knowledge of the hazard that caused the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:40 pm
Recently, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case involving a defendant grocery store’s claim that it could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because it did not have knowledge of the hazard that caused the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 2:26 pm
" In their opposition, plaintiffs state, The Attorney General should remain a defendant in order to preserve this Court's ability to award Plainiffs the full relief that they seek: an injunction immediately directing the chief legal officer of California - and every state official subject to his supervising authority - to cease enforcing Prop. 8. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:19 pm
However, plaintiff’s counsel later advised defendants that plaintiff had deactivated the account and could not reactivate it. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:08 am
Judge Holderman granted defendant Pacific Marketing International’s (“PMI’s”) motion to stay plaintiff Ignite USA’s patent litigation case pending the results of PMI’s Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) seeking to invalidate Ignite USA’s asserted patent regarding a drinking container. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:26 am
Plaintiff first asserted that the City’s Sign was facially unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:29 pm
Corp., the plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:27 am
.) -- denying plaintiff’s interim petition for award of attorneys fees and costs because agency, not plaintiff, was prevailing party in underlying litigation; rejecting plaintiff’s contention that court’s scheduling orders and minute entries altered parties’ legal relationship or granted plaintiff relief on merits; further rejecting plaintiff’s argument that agency changed its legal… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 1:36 am
Plaintiff's adult daughter was appointed personal representative of plaintiff's estate and a submitted a claim to defendant's attorney. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:16 am
.) -- denying plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees after concluding that plaintiff was ineligible for fees. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:33 am
In layman's terms, the defendant is saying to the court that even if you assume everything in the plaintiff's complaint is true, you should still throw it out because the plaintiff has not stated a claim against the defendant. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Turns out the plaintiff didn’t file an opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, an opposition that was due on July 14. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm
On appeal, the court reversed the lower court’s decision in favor of the plaintiff. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:53 pm
Dec. 9, 2014) In this breach of contract case, the court granted in part Defendant’s motion to compel and, in light of Plaintiff’s piecemeal production (which the court had earlier cautioned against) and other discovery failures, fashioned a “new and simpler approach” to discovery, including the identification of 13 search terms/phrases to be utilized when searching “ALL [of Plaintiff’s] corporate documents, files,… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:00 pm
Martinez granted the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff ‘s responses to discovery and ordered the plaintiff to “image its sources of electronically stored information (‘ESI’), including its hard drives and QuickBook files”. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
Judge Gale also granted most of the components of the plaintiff’s motion to compel against the defendant for various discovery...Read the whole entry... [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:42 am
It held that the plaintiff’s incorrect information was not enough to adequately put the state agency on notice for what they were supposed to be defending against. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:56 am
In most Florida personal injury cases, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant violated a duty of care that was owed to the plaintiff, and that the defendant’s breach of this duty resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Plus, Mercari’s terms of service foisted a California choice-of-law provision onto plaintiff, which was the basis for dismissing plaintiff’s Florida consumer protections claims. [read post]
