Search for: "Plaintiffs Lead Counsel" Results 6021 - 6040 of 6,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm by MBettman
Parma Bd. of Education, 44 Ohio App. 3d 169 (8th Dist. 1988) (“[a]s a general rule contract claims survive the death of the plaintiff. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am by Bill Otis
  As Judge Kozinski has elsewhere pointed out, Mike Nifong, the Duke-rape-hoax prosecutor, may lead the prosecutorial pack in that category, although he was probably outdone the D.A. who put Michael Morton in jail for 25 years by hiding a mountain of Brady material. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:23 am by Randy Barnett
In congressional testimony in March of this year, Carrie Severino, Chief Counsel and Policy Director of the Judicial Crisis Network, said this: “Historically Congress has induced purchases through tax incentives or by conditioning other government benefits on purcha [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:04 pm by Geoffrey Manne
  In other words, it is much more likely than not that search discrimination is pro-competitive rather than anticompetitive, and doctrinal error cost concerns accordingly counsel great hesitation in any antitrust intervention, administrative or judicial. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 1:02 pm
I wound up representing a number of the very sick kids, and eventually was the lead counsel for the vast majority of the plaintiffs in the entire litigation. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Poster is Of Counsel to the firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 7:13 am by Juan C. Antúnez
The contrast between the siblings was a key theme throughout the litigation, as reported by the DBR in Grandchildren going to court over real estate trust money: The plaintiff, Carole Brody, 75, lives with her daughter in a two-bedroom apartment in Aventura and buys what she needs on her monthly Social Security stipend. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
"During the oral hearing, applicant's counsel made a particularly cogent argument that while the prefatory letter 'E' is readily seen as connoting 'electronic' in the context of the Internet, it is not perceived this way as used in connection with electronic devices. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court then proceeded to offer several reasons that this was a special case, many of which will doubtless be seized on by plaintiffscounsel. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although the OFCCP’s focus on current pay, rather than on pay decisions does not comport with the relevant legal standard following the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (89 EPD ¶42,827), contractors should still analyze current pay in addition to decisions impacting pay, according to experts speaking at the National Employment Law Institute’s (NELI) Thirty-First Annual Affirmative Action Briefing in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 5:40 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As part of the negotiations leading up to the accord, BNSF removed from the program approximately 400 workers. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:48 am by INFORRM
  The court ruled that Google had to de-list certain search results when users searched for the plaintiff’s name. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Mark Walsh
Doug Evans, the local district attorney, served as the lead prosecutor at all six of the trials. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am by fjhinojosa
Watts’ article Differences without Distinctions: Boyle’s Government Contractor Defense Fails to Recognize the Critical Differences between Civilian and Military Plaintiffs and Between Military and Non-Military Procurement is cited in §352 of the Dobbs’ Law of Torts (June 2021 Update). 14. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:14 am
While the rulings may prove a major hurdle, lawyers for many plaintiffs say their legal efforts may just be starting. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG)   Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local distinctiveness in trademark expungement case:… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The Court of Appeal began on the premise that the issue of whether Gombe State or Kano State had jurisdiction was a matter of private international law, and not an issue of that was governed by a States’ civil procedures rules that governs dispute within a judicial division.[3] It also held that it is the plaintiff’s statement of claim that determines jurisdiction.[4] The Court of Appeal then approved its previous decisions that in inter-state matters of a private international… [read post]