Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 9,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
Woodlock of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that Section 922(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which bans predispute arbitration agreements regarding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower protection, is retroactive. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
On the constitutional question of whether the flat fee violated an indigent client‘s right to counsel, the district court, citing United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:21 pm
By Karin Johnson and Megan Grant* When the Supreme Court issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
New Jersey Dental Assoc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:01 am
Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Our final relist comes from a state that always avoids judicial controversy: Freddie Lee Hall v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court is the only court in the country that is not required to abide by a judicial code of ethics. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
The district court granted the motion. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
First, in Robinson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm
It was enjoined by federal district courts across the country within hours of going into effect—but its carelessness caused a great deal of chaos in the meantime. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
United States 13-1309Issue: Whether, when the district court disposes of a motion for a new trial while an appeal is pending in the court of appeals, a defendant must file a second notice of appeal in order for the court of appeals to have jurisdiction to consider the issue that was before the district court in the motion for a new trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:43 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Stern v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am
It’s settled New York law that the state’s courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to entertain suits for judicial dissolution of foreign business entities. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
Barnette, which held that school children could not be compelled to salute the flag, and overruled Minersville School District v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:51 am
Both the postage and the postmark were dated July 7, 2010 (Day 31).In AFFIRMING Queens County NYC Civil Court's order denying plaintiff's motion and granting Elrac's cross motion for summary judgment, the Appellate Term, Second Department for the 2nd, 11th, and 13th Judicial Districts, held:In its brief, plaintiff concedes "the fact that the envelope was postmarked by the Post Office on July 7," but argues that it was mailed on July 6, 2010. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
The first is Yohe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
