Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 6021 - 6040 of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am by Rosalind English
 There is nothing modern or nanny-state about the doctrine that make masters liable to society for the wrongdoing of their servants. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
Mihir's post is set out below:Recently, the Supreme Court of India in Severn Trent Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Based on the evidence in the case, the court found that the defendant had not been able to show that the watches had been put on the EU market by the trade mark holder. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
The same provision further states that the ISP’s knowledge is to be presumed only when an infringement notice sent by the right holder includes certain detailed information like “the specific localisation of the contested content” -- that is to say, the URL of the allegedly infringing content. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor)   Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents (IPKat) (EPLAW)… [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:30 pm by Stephen Wermiel
 The holder of the office rarely grants interviews and only occasionally gives speeches describing the work. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
In the context of merger analysis, a noted authority on antitrust law, sums up stating that: “[f]or antitrust purposes,…. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am by Fred Rocafort
” These restrictions do not extend to green card holders or dual U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:09 am
Furthermore, since Hadid smiled and posed for the photo, she contributed to the creativity and originality of the image, pointing to Rogers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]