Search for: "State v. Husband"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 7,278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Federal law exposing the husband’s interest to forfeiture was clear, but the District Court had to refer to state law to determine the nature of the property interests owned by the husband and wife. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Federal law exposing the husband’s interest to forfeiture was clear, but the District Court had to refer to state law to determine the nature of the property interests owned by the husband and wife. 755 F.Supp. at 171. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:36 am
Orchard became seriously sick and sore, her husband began to experience a loss of sensation and movement. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:11 pm
" At the time Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson was the judge responsible for that docket; also at the time Judge Johnson's husband Tim was the acting United States Attorney. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:40 am
Supreme Court acknowledged in McCleskey v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:49 am
See Fein v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:25 am
But today -- finally -- I get to share with you the California Supreme Court's opinion in Boeken v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm
” State v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:59 am
Fraley v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:50 am
First: In White v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:47 am
Lombardo and State v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 pm
In White v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:17 pm
In White v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:51 am
In a recent appellate decision out of San Diego County (CMRE Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:27 am
The Southern District's decision was later affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Nordwind v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:16 pm
The first appellant married her husband (‘the sponsor’) in Afghanistan in 1979. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am
The Randolph Court held that “physically present co-occupant's stated refusal to permit entry prevails, rendering the warrantless search unreasonable and invalid as to him”, i.e., if the husband objects that nullifies the wife’s consent (and vice versa). [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court of Florida just issued an important decision (Perera v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court, May 03, 2010 Renico v. [read post]
