Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 6021 - 6040 of 16,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Following the court’s dismissal of the derivative action challenging the same 2011 lease, not surprisingly the siblings moved to dismiss the petition, which Justice Ash granted by Decision and Order dated March 22, 2017, stating that “[t]his Court . . . has already determined, after a trial, that the Respondents have acted properly with regards to the subject lease with Jersey Lynne. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Following the court’s dismissal of the derivative action challenging the same 2011 lease, not surprisingly the siblings moved to dismiss the petition, which Justice Ash granted by Decision and Order dated March 22, 2017, stating that “[t]his Court . . . has already determined, after a trial, that the Respondents have acted properly with regards to the subject lease with Jersey Lynne. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
It also has echoes in the attempts of some in state legislatures to criminalize dissent in new and creative ways. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:40 am by Ilya Somin
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the broad view in its controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:11 pm by Howard Friedman
 By a 10-3 vote, in a series of opinions spanning 205 pages, the Court of Appeals in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:38 pm by Claire Poppelwell-Scevak
This was clearly illustrated when the Court confirmed Schalk and Kopf in Chapin et Charpentier v France (2016). [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm by Larry
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
Alito agreed with the majority in its assessment of District 1, which the state admitted had been drawn as a majority-minority district. [read post]