Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 36,826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2013, 3:00 am
Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
The trial court granted the team’s motion for summary judgment, but in City of Oakland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:57 pm
" Rather, under the rationale the Smith Court used to preserve the holdings in the unemployment compensation cases, the Commission would have to employ a Sherbert v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 10:51 am
He summed it up with typical clarity: The Constitution says “the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
23 May 2022, 11:45 pm
When Politico published Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion that would undo Roe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
” except “as required under federal or state law. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:16 am
Estate of Barbara Pew v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Back in 2003 the United States Supreme Court set out to decide in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
The Defendant’s argument on vires boiled down to the need to distinguish between the enabling primary legislation (which provided very broad powers to the Secretary of State) and the detail of the existing scheme enacted under secondary legislation, which was not determinative of the Secretary of State’s powers. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
These limits are, in essence, concerned with the legitimate exercise of state power, be it legislative or adjudicative. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
These limits are, in essence, concerned with the legitimate exercise of state power, be it legislative or adjudicative. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:41 am
The idea that the Court is untroubled by broad delegations of power to the President in foreign affairs is most commonly traced to the Court’s 1936 decision United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:17 am
In U.S. disability history, Halderman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:24 am
The interim policy will apply retroactively to all baseload power plants that have sought permits since April 2007 (when the US Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, July 9, on two important presidential power cases, TRUMP v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The Court will explore in Bartlett v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
