Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 13,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 6:47 am
" Compare Holmes Oil Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 2:59 pm
See Murray v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 2:27 pm
[Federal Register] [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:54 pm
A frequently asked question in our practice is, can an acronym register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and be protected as a federal trademark? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
See State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am
At first instance, Mr Justice Stephens granted leave to Galloway to serve proceedings on Google at its registered office in Delaware. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
States and local jurisdictions have wasted no time implementing barriers to voting in Texas, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Alabama, and Ohio. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
”Since the Cartier judgment not much has happened in the area of trade marks and blocking injunctions ... at least until yesterday, when HHJ Hacon (sitting as a High Court judge) issued his judgment in Cartier and Another v BSkyB and Others [2016] EWHC 339 (Ch) (Cartier II).This was another application for a website blocking in which the claimants and defendants were the same as those in Cartier (or Cartier I), ie - respectively - owners of registered trade marks… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit concluded that it has jurisdiction to review challenges to the controversial “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Third, LPS's web-harvester did not send any tracking data at all and did not register any print fees, even if LPS downloaded or saved a record.LPS used its web-harvester to obtain a large number of records from the 82 county databases it subscribed to over approximately two years. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon, United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:55 am
In Varkey Joseph v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Germany v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 4:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
Its role in the Apple case is framed by a 1977 Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
United States oral arguments. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Defendants had no in-state offices, real estate, were not registered to do business, had no address, phone numbers, bank accounts, or employees.Google Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
