Search for: "State v. So " Results 6021 - 6040 of 116,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:21 pm
You'll recall that when the new, broader standard for government takings came down in Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
By Tobias Thienel  A recent case in the English courts - until now the High Court and the Court of Appeal - has raised absolutely central points about the act of state doctrine, and in so doing has neatly explained the doctrine. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:14 am by Christine Hurt
  State law oversight cases are not winners generally, and it's hard to point to a particular false statement or omission relating to broad business strategy. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:31 am by Walter Olson
Tompkins (1938) was the New Deal-era decision that directed federal courts to apply the law of the states in which they are located, and in so doing abolished a huge body of federal common law. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:30 am
Trump repeatedly said he wanted to forbid Muslims from entering the United States, and then said he would do so by using nationality as a proxy. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Karl Bayer
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]