Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc" Results 6021 - 6040 of 12,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Greg Stohr reports at Bloomberg that “[t]he U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  Never too late 29 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Martin Luther King’s movie ‘Selma’ and copyright problems | CJEU’s copyright decisions awaited in 2015 | The Modern Law of Patents reviewed | China becoming a ‘protector’ of patent rights | ‘Je suis charlie’ trade mark in France and OHIM| UK IPO logo’s licensing system | High Court for England and Wales in Enterprise Holdings… [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:59 am
That section prohibits `[t]ransmission of material harmful to minors to a minor by electronic device or equipment[.] [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Don't let the sun go down on me...Too busy soaking up the sun (which kindly decided to show up) to keep up with the latest IPKat news? [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:52 am by Rich Vetstein
This post is a continuation of my discussion about the recent Massachusetts Appeals Court case of NRT New England, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Finally, in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Interestingly, the court didn’t hold that the registered LTTB marks were per se invalid—they could still be protectable if used on clothing tags. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:46 am by assoulineberlowe
Defense Defense attorneys who were celebrating the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s July 28, 2011 decision in Dionne v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
In upholding the threat of job loss violation, the Board distinguished a Sixth Circuit case involving the same Respondent, DTR Industries, Inc., v. [read post]