Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Giannicos v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
No prior notification of the publication was given to Mr Ferdinand or his advisors. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Starbucks and Doe 1 v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:07 am
Although second medical use protection has had limited importance in the treatment of COVID-19, it has put in the spotlight the overall need for quick reactions to new diseases, which is one of the many factors justifying such protection, according to Jochen Bühling, partner of the German law firm of Krieger Mes & Graf v. der Groeben and editor of ‘Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses’. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
(Vernor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Ingenious Media and Mr McKenna appealed and were given permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
Consideration was also given to the fact the leases were entered into during a time of significant inflation. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
First, the court held that Rule 608 prohibited using specific acts to impeach the witness's credibility. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
When I came up with the idea in ‘92, it seemed pretty radical, given how clunky and cumbersome scanning was at the time. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
No reason has been given for the decision. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:47 am
But I've just about given up. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 3:58 am
Parliament has just given us a very basic outline as to how settlements should be calculated, with the result that we rely upon case law for the specifics. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its heavily anticipated opinion in the B&B Hardware v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
The relevant part of the domestic decision was “Given the defendants’ statements, it is clear that they did not intend to attack the [applicant’s] honour. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:22 am
” This one might have been a bit easier, given that both my query and this result use “law practice. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
