Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
For this proposition, the court relied on Supreme Court’s opinion in Eldred v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
Here’s the abstract of Reining in the Purcell Principle: About a month before the 2014 election, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of four extraordinary orders in election law cases. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 7:48 pm
The Tax Court rejected this argument, but summarized the controlling law as follows:In [United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:54 pm
United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990), held that the acquittal evidence can be introduced in subsequent trials, without falling afoul of the constitutional right against double jeopardy (which incorporates the collateral estoppel doctrine). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
For this proposition, the court relied on Supreme Court’s opinion in Eldred v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
" NAACP v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Even if this judgment is wrong, the United States has compelling interests in sustaining the mandate and this accommodation. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 5:43 am
The plaintiff’s malpractice claim is based on the mistaken theory that the failure to submit either (i) the November 2016 Termination Letter or (ii) the 2017 audited financial statements would have changed United Stated District Court Judge (ret.) [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 12:26 pm
In Constantino v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:33 am
The interesting case of West v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
In Moore v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
(By the way Bill, 4 is not the record for a single day, on 30 Sep 2005 for instance, CAAF decided 6 cases and I suspect that CAAF has done more on previous end-of-term days).United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:17 am
In 1998, United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 2:59 am
Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, warrantless searches are by statute, unreasonable. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:58 pm
United States, supports the defense that, in order for the government to prove guilt, it must prove that the depositor "willfully" violated the statute. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract:In deciding Meredith v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
***An article by Swibel is cited within United States Patent 7085745 (Swibel, Matthew, "Pay Up! [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm
United States of America, a case that there can be no doubt rushed along the repeal of DADT. [read post]
