Search for: "United States v. John" Results 6021 - 6040 of 11,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
That means that §602(a)(1) allows the importation into the United States of a copy of a protected work purchased abroad. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  Second, the federal rules do not (except in rare cases involving threats or humiliation) allow John Doe pleadings. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:12 am by SHG
Not because they necessarily deserve it, but certainly because police could stand being reminded that under the United States Constitution, we can. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Don Verrilli, appearing on behalf of the United States to support the Project. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am by Rory Little
United States would “lead to . . . 40 minutes of free time for police officers to investigate any crimes that they want. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:10 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Omega concedes that it designed and secured copyright protection for the Globe Design for the purpose of using copyright law to restrict the unauthorized sale of Omega watches in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:04 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm by William Baude
The United States has filed an amicus brief taking a middle position. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
GigaOm reporter Jeff John Roberts opined that this is “because the King family aggressively enforces copyright at all turns, unleashing lawyers in the direction of anyone who seeks to use the civil rights icon’s speeches or images without permission. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
Evans and continuing through his recent opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The ACLU and the federal government settled Al-Kidd v. [read post]