Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 10,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:24 am
United Telephone Co. of Ohio, 136 Ohio St.3d 231, 2013-Ohio-309. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rendered judgment last year, overturning the district court’s finding that the red soles could not be trademarked. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
In a development that has the potential to change the way private securities suits in the United States are litigated, the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
The official case name is United States of America v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Alexander.Alexander, Mark C.St. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Tuesday also marked the end of the line for Unger v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
” Brief for the United States as Amicus CuriaeSupporting Respondents, 2011 WL 741927, at *19, see Mensing, 131 S. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
Yesterday the Court heard argument in Lawson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:42 am
Lowy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
Circuit wrote: An administrative agency is not subject to Article III of the Constitution of the United States [and] so the petitioner would have had no need to establish its standing to participate in the proceedings before the agency. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that a Texas attorney may not engage in class arbitration against the parent company of the legal research system LexisNexis. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
” Id. at 334 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
United States, 404 F.3d 744, 750 (3d Cir. 2005), and dismissal is appropriate only if, accepting all of the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the plaintiff has failed to plead “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
