Search for: "Williams v. Doe" Results 6021 - 6040 of 7,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
 Prior to the ReDigi decision, in 2010 the 9th Circuit issued its judgment in Vernor v Autodesk (a case concerning promo CDs), in which it ruled that, pursuant to 17 USC §109(d) the first sale doctrine does not apply to a person who possesses a copy of a copyright-protected work without owning it. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on William N. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
William Samek, a key state witness,clarification of his original trial testimony. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
In his petition, McCarthy maintains that the clause does not foreclose all judicial review and that other constitutional provisions, such as the quorum clause, indicate that physical attendance is a constitutional requirement. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Emma Svoboda
On April 19, the Supreme Court delivered a decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
Other interesting news Does the press coverage at the time of an individual’s arrest have to be very, very bad for it to be regarded as a contempt of court? [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm by James Jolin
The story of contemporary U.S. abortion law does not end with Casey, however. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Simms does not offer any evidence that he did not tell the truth in his colloquy with the court. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Simms does not offer any evidence that he did not tell the truth in his colloquy with the court. [read post]