Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 6041 - 6060 of 10,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 9:02 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In such a case, the principle that choice of seat is an exclusive jurisdiction clause will not survive.The statement in C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282 and Shashoua v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:50 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Las acciones programadas para el 11 de febrero, "El Día Que Dijimos Basta", incluyen: Argentina: Asociación por los Derechos Civiles y Fundación Vía Libre anunciarán su litigio contra la comisión supervisora de inteligencia en el Congreso argentino. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Parts I, II, and III of this series provided a literature review and commentary on the history, technology, food safety, and food quality aspects relating to the use of ionizing radiation in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach processing. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:24 pm by Lydia Estep
Some of those benefits include (a) not having a committee of unsecured creditors appointed (except for cause, after notice and a hearing) whose attorney’s fees would be paid by the debtor’s estate, (b) 90 days from the petition date for the debtor to file a plan, (c) elimination of the ability of other parties to file a competing plan, (d) a much easier road to confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan with elimination of the absolute priority rule and the… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:25 pm
Harris, 2004 BCCA 146] that influence an award of non-pecuniary damages includes: (a)   age of the plaintiff; (b)   nature of the injury; (c)   severity and duration of pain; (d)   disability; (e)   emotional suffering; and (f)   loss or impairment of life; I would add the following factors, although they may arguably be subsumed in the above list: (g)   impairment of family, marital and… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:46 am by Rose Hughes
The device was defined as comprising a)  protruding parts, b) means for removing a material and c) a steering device. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Segundo o relator, “dúvidas não há sobre o preceito constitucional atinente à natureza do CNJ. [read post]