Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 6041 - 6060 of 7,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 13 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will give judgment in the case of Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors (heard on 3 December 2010). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm by Veronika Gaertner
In addition, the 2nd question equally raises fundamental issues of the application of mutual trust: in practice, mutual recognition operates on the basis of forms which are filled in by the court of the Member State of origin. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:23 pm by Bexis
Danek Medical, Inc., 182 F.3d 281, 285 (4th Cir. 1999), and Smith v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am by Susan Brenner
Officers Smith and Patrick and Deputy Jones [arrived at his] residence around 9:30 p.m., followed by David Sullivan, an investigator with the district attorney's office . . . who knew Newell. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:23 pm by SOIssues
Not only is there residency restrictions which make it almost impossible to find suitable housing in many cities but also many rental applications ask if a person is on the registry...once that is disclosed.. the applicant is denied. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith, 195 N.J.Super. 468, 480 A.2d 236, 238 (Law Div.1984) (recognizing that “‘sympathetic considerations play no part in a determination under’ the de minimis statute”). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by John L. Welch
Joseph Smith would like a second opinion, after the Board affirmed a genericness refusal of the term FIRSTAIDE for adhesive bandages, first aid kits, and various medical items. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:13 am by sally
Supreme Court The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 (08 December 2010) Progress Property Company Ltd v Moorgarth Group Ltd [2010] UKSC 55 (08 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A v B & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1378 (08 December 2010) Perrins v Holland & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1398 (08 December 2010) Tilianu, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397 (08 December 2010) … [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am by Rosalind English
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532  and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of review in… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The application was opposed and Mr Justice Calvert-Smith J, granted the relief asked for (including that the claimant be anonymised) and provided for a very short return day for a full hearing between the parties, 2 days later. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:22 am by Gene Quinn
Right: IPO Executive Director Herb Wamsley, Commissioner for Patents Bob Stoll and Bill Smith, of co-event sponsor Woodcock Washburn at the head table. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:53 pm by Gene Quinn
The early morning patent session, which I attended, was moderated by Bill Smith, currently Of Counsel with Woodcock Washburn and himself a former member of the BPAI. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:55 am by Mandelman
How can you tell what is legitimate loan modification assistance from what is offered by a “scammer”. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:59 am by admin
  In the case of the non-disclosure of a spouse or common law partner, Canada’s immigration officers could say quite rightly, “Had I the visa officer known that Bob Smith had a wife before marrying his sponsor (i.e. the person that sponsored Bob Smith for immigration), Bob Smith himself would never have obtained his own permanent resident visa. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:35 am by The Legal Blog
As Adam Smith observed: "there is an invisible hand at work to take care of this".As far as American law is concerned, it is said that the Sherman Act, 1890, is the first codification of recognized common law principles of competition law. [read post]