Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 10,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 11:19 am
Auer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Court’s Myopia The plurality opinion in McCutcheon, like the majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
In 1993, President Bill Clinton appointed Justice Ginsburg to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
The five dissenting judges argued that this “evidentiary privilege” — traced to the Supreme Court’s 1953 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 2:35 pm
UPDATE: I should note this approach will not resolve the companion case of United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
As I noted in my introduction, I want to focus on one aspect of the medical marijuana laws: those relating to the sale of medical marijuana, which involves a little something the United States is normally quite fond of – capitalism. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
American Lung Association v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
Noriega said that the game portrayed him as a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state, and that it had damaged his reputation. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 628 (1984).This strikes me as quite wrong. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:22 am
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:00 pm
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
The goal of the present law is to fill vacancies in the State Legislature and the United States Senate in a timely manner when such vacancies occur. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
The plans, called Medicare Advantage, are run through private health insurers as an alternative to traditional fee-for-service Medicare plans.Medicare Billing Fraud: DRUG SUPPLIER CAN'T BE LIABLE FOR KEEPING OVERPAYMENTS, COURT RULES, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Romer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:38 am
Thus, like in the McKinney v. [read post]
