Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 21,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 5:05 am
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
That was the issue in the case of Adams v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
The UK Court of Appeal, R v Martin [2013] EWCA Crim 1420, dismissed an appeal against a two-year prison sentence for various cybercrimes by the appellant, Lewys Martin. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm
Quinta Jurecic posted the government and President Trump’s motion to dismiss in House Ways and Means Committee v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 9:39 am
” Ginsburg, Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Among them are: (1) rule of law, (2) constitutional values of states, (3) human rights, (4) war crimes, (5) international justice, (6) influence of national or local laws, (7) protection of national interests v. global governance. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Olympus Spa v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
AMP v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:51 pm
Source: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/30/v/70Read More [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Voting Rights for Non-Residents at Issue in Frank v CanadaShould apologies be admissible in court? [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
Dynamite Games Pty Limited v Aruze Gaming Australia Pty Limited [2013] FCA 163 (4 March 2013) Australia’s innovation patent is widely considered to have an unreasonably low threshold of validity – so much so, in fact, that last year IP Australia put forward a proposal to eliminate the ‘innovative step’ standard entirely, and require that innovation patent claims meet the same test for ‘inventive step’ as a standard patent. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: SC19372 - In re Yasiel R. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
TTAB Vacates Prince of Wales Section 2(b) Decision and Remands Application to the Examining Attorney
21 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:10 am
In Hodes & Nauser MDs PA v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:04 am
Stangenberg v Bellamy Software, 2016 ABQB 160 http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2016/2016abqb160/2016abqb160.pdf … [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:07 am
McCleese v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:13 am
In Perinçek v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:57 am
Hart Charles Conway Jr v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:32 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions Body: AC35802 - Estate of Haburey v. [read post]
