Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 8,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:52 am by Roger Alford
Courts, as the least democratic branch, should play a primary role in incorporating global governance at home without the intervention of the elected branches of government. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Hodges, Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am by Kelly Goles
We initiated the State Law Libraries Outreach Project to strengthen ties between the Law Library and state law libraries. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The most intriguing, as the Court heard the case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am by James Jolin
On the side of the executive branch, he added he would like to see the Department of Justice commit to not prosecuting psychedelic-related offenses. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Davis II Chair in Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Peter M. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Ryan Scoville
One might argue that those soldiers were no longer U.S. citizens because they were fighting for the Confederacy, but that position is inconsistent with the view—supported by the Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:55 am by Kimberly Alderman
  The gist is that the court does not have the authority to tell the executive branch what to do. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]