Search for: "Browning v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 8,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by James W. Ward
  AB 9 is a repeat of 2018’s AB 1870, which Governor Jerry Brown vetoed. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Hill, Carolyn Shapiro argues that Democratic senators should try to” get behind the smokescreen” created by “the rhetoric of neutrality” by, for example, using Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
Brown, a 5-to-4 majority gave state courts great leeway in death penalty trials to remove jurors who express even mild doubt about capital punishment. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by brooks
   The Sweatt v Painter decision was then a linchpin in the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision of Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., No. 11-0265 Opinion of the Court Dissenting Applying its decision today in ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER... v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 3:20 pm
  And he noted in a Court of Appeal decision out of the Ontario Courts one case, Chang v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Civil rights law in the US is completely dead unless you’re not brown or poor. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]