Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 6,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Chacon, No. 07-4439 A sex offense perpetrated in the absence of consent, and which does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force, is nevertheless a "forcible sex offense" encompassed within the Sentencing Guidelines definition of a "crime of violence. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court of California, July 14, 2008 Silicon Valley Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:13 pm
(Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:26 pm
Bogue In the case of Coos County Board of County Commissioners v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
(People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Coop. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court saw the license denial as an effort by New York to horde a resource and thereby keep prices for its consumers low.Edwards v California (1941) considered a challenge to a California law aimed at reducing the influx of dustbowl indigents to the state. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
Chimel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:28 pm
One that appears in the pages of the California Appellate Reporter many, many times. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
Had defendant's "abduction" been accomplished by mendacity rather than by force, that circumstance would not render the rule in Ker inapplicable. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
As a result of these various forces, murrelet populations crashed, from a historic estimate of 60,000 murrelets in California alone to today only 9,000 birds all together in California, Oregon and Washington. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:08 am
In its 21-page opinion in DiCarlo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
Finally, the Nuts and Boalts blog returns from a bit of a hiatus with a long and thoughtful piece about California's new law forcing drivers to go "hands-free" with their cell phones or be ticketed. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Geren, No. 06-1666 In cases concerning the availability of habeas corpus relief arising from an international coalition force's detention of American citizens who voluntarily traveled to Iraq and were alleged to have committed crimes there, the Court rules that the habeas statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command, even when those forces are acting as part of a multinational coalition. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Docket: 07-512 Case name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act permits a "price squeeze" claim if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]
