Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 16,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 5:59 pm
Even more interesting was a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court, released February 3, 2017 Kushnir v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
In the meantime Marilyn Stowe and Baroness Deech, cross-bench peer, discussed the the case, life long spousal maintenance agreements and the state of the law generally as to financial settlements on divorce, in Women’s Hour on Radio 4 here. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
In the final hours before his resignation, Flynn provided a defiant interview to the Daily Caller saying that he had “crossed no lines,” in his discussions with Kislyak, and insisted that the steady stream of leaks from those inside the government needed to be prosecuted. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
This ruling indicates the unexpected albeit preferable obiter dictum that the Brussels II bis Regulation applies on declaratory decisions concerning private divorces issued by Member States’ authorities. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
In Fairmont, Fairmont was party to a cross-border financing arrangement. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Quintal v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court endorsed such a test in a case called Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
From that perspective, the odd part about Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 11:44 am
Facts: This case (Marland et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Illott v The Blue Cross & Ors, heard 12 December 2016. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
"Their case is necessarily based on inference from the facts (including publicly available facts) known to them before disclosure, witness statements and cross examination of the defendants' witnesses. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
https://t.co/8dpkkIEPkB -> The Supreme Court Tackles Disparaging Trademarks https://t.co/Z0Ma8wL7yi -> US court refuses to enforce an "In the box" agreement in Samsung case https://t.co/aZLvj8pZhX -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-02-08 https://t.co/AOo6tZRLjo -> Blaclock's cost Notice of Appeal https://t.co/6lewkQ2HtR quotes from my casecomment blog post https://t.co/8ELSIC2lf4, H/T @howardknopf -> Link to US 9th Circuit decision refusing to stay travel ban… [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 9:11 pm
Kellner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
Although, rather unhelpfully, the second judgment does not link to the first or provide the full citation, it is clear from simply cross referencing the facts (or just the case numbers) that the X v X in the first judgment and the X v X in the second are one and the same case. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 1:40 pm
Additional Resources: Entila v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:50 pm
The Court further stated the fact that Husband’s adultery did not lead to the breakdown of the marriage does not bar recrimination as a defense, stating “Causation is not an element of the defense of recrimination. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 3:50 pm
The Court further stated the fact that Husband’s adultery did not lead to the breakdown of the marriage does not bar recrimination as a defense, stating “Causation is not an element of the defense of recrimination. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
Bundling has different consequences.Competition—as an economist, we look for cross-elasticity of demand. [read post]
