Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 32,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2011, 5:33 pm
" Therefore, an employee who earns more than $72 for an 8 hour day (assuming an $8 minimum wage) does not receive a split shift premium, even if he works a split shift. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:29 am
The SEC proposal also would revise Rule 14a-8(i)(8)'s "election" exclusion and restore the ability of shareholders to file resolutions to amend a corporation's governing documents to address nomination procedures or disclosure provisions, provided that the proposal does not conflict with the commission's proposed Rule 14a-11. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
§ 101.0215(a)(1), (25), (31). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Pico.)Judge Reinhardt does not argue that Prop 8 is on all fours with Colorado Amendment 2 from Romer--indeed, he goes out of his way on page 45 of the opinion to identify the principal differences between the two initiatives. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:03 pm
Does Perry want to retreat from that? [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:16 am
Does it mean that the claim has not been brought to hearing? [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:29 am
The need to ensure public confidence does not mean the need to ensure popularity. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:45 am
Responsibilities of an Owner of a Dangerous Dog: 1. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 6:38 pm
These striking results are often interpreted as showing that conscious will does not cause actions or that we do not have free will, but only free won't. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 8:29 pm
What does this claim cover? [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:00 pm
See Note to paragraph (i)(1) of Rule 14a-8, 17 CFR 240.14a-8 ("some proposals are not considered proper under state law if they would be binding on the company if approved by shareholders. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:15 am
Slip op. at 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
Justice Breyer, in his final term had 8 dissents, with only 1 concurrence. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:43 am
” Having regard to Section 8(3) and 8(1) read with 8(4) of the NCA, the court said that it could not find that the deed of suretyship and indemnity executed by that respondent should be regarded as a “credit guarantee” to which the NCA has application. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:51 am
Rule 14-1(10), which pertains to plaintiffs who recover in this Court a sum within the jurisdiction of the Provincial Court, does not apply in this case. [6] Rule 15-1(15)(a) states a party in a fast track action is entitled to costs of $8,000, exclusive of disbursements, if the time spent on the hearing is one day or less, unless the court orders otherwise or the parties consent. [7] I agree with the plaintiffs that although they had proceeded by way of summary trial and… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:01 pm
§ 1328(f)(1)] So you must wait 8 years when (1st filing = 7,11,12 ? [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Ct. 1520 (2008)........................................................................... 2, 8 Becker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
Though not quite Catgate Mark 2, this thinking does portray a somewhat creative approach to the interpretation of judicial comments. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:22 am
Civ. 1ère, 6 avril 2011, n°10-19053). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:46 am
Ordinarily, the covered period is 8 weeks from loan disbursement, however, the under the alternative payroll period, the 8-week covered period can begin on the first payroll period after disbursement and continue 8 weeks from that date. [read post]
