Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 6041 - 6060 of 16,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind of N.C., Inc., 487 U.S. 781, 796–97 (1988). [2].W. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind of N.C., Inc., 487 U.S. 781, 796–97 (1988). [2].W. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:22 pm by Camilla Hrdy
Clearly some of these will be redundant and denied, for example under Section 2(d) likely to be confused with a prior mark. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Furthermore, the representative confirmed that he was already authorized to pay the full appeal fee on October 25, 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:20 pm by Geri Haight
  The Section 2(d) refusal of the applied-for BLUE IVY CARTER mark is limited only to proposed Class 14 (metal key chains and key rings, jewelry, clocks and watches) and 25 (clothing) goods. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:33 am by Dianne Saxe
 … [18] In contrast, s. 163.1(2) of the EPA does not contain language explicitly compelling witnesses to speak to regulatory investigators, nor does it provide protection for privilege or protection against self-incrimination. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 6:32 am by Shanelle Van
Third, Fihn contends that, while the TPNW does not raise the safeguards requirements, “this treaty does not lower the standard of safeguards from the NPT. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
If he does not, he shall be requested to do so within a period to be specified by the EPO. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:08 am by bklemm@foley.com
The rule does not apply to sale-of-a-business noncompetes when they are executed with a substantial owner, partner or member — i.e., someone with at least a 25% ownership interest in the business.The exception does not carve out sale-related noncompetes with individuals owning less than 25%, and therefore such noncompetes would be void under the proposed rule. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:59 am by CMS
First, the obligation in VATA, s 25(3) for HMRC to pay a VAT credit only arises once it is established that a VAT credit is in fact due. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:41 pm
Exactly what does "monitored for life" mean? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:26 am by David M. McLain
An unintended and unforeseen injurious occurrence; something that does not occur in the usual course of events or that could not be reasonably anticipated. 2. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:49 am by Melissa Wojtylak
 And we wonder further:  in cases where both the manufacturer and surgeon are named, where does res ipsacome in? [read post]