Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 6041 - 6060 of 12,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
This post and one I posted this morning offer a total of six more suggestions about what can be done, whether through legislation or through the Supreme Court’s reversal of some past decisions. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
After the 5-4 "decision" last month in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case was certified as a class action for all interns who worked for defendant from 2005 through 2010. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 pm
Alston does not demonstrate that any of the above grounds are presently applicable to this matter. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
At one point during the encounter, [he] appeared to receive a phone call, and he responded to the person on the phone: `Yeah, I'm with her right now, she's scared, but there's not really nothing here I could charge her for, so we will wrap things up. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
Although Damon is a journalist, not a legal scholar like Kurt, I think he does a fine job defending the claim that the Privileges or Immunities of citizens of the United States included their fundamental, natural, but unenumerated rights. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
  The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Lester, a private citizen who makes an arrest does so at his/her peril and if the person arrested did not commit the crime, the private citizen who makes the arrest is liable despite probable cause, and neither good faith nor vindictiveness is relevant except on the issue of punitive damages, Gill v. [read post]