Search for: "GRANT v. STATE"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 61,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2013, 9:17 am
Questions presented from ScotusBlog: Burrags v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:23 pm
Issue summaries from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Burt v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:55 pm
United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:34 am
From Friday, issue summaries from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Packingham v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 5:49 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:30 am
Boulware v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:32 pm
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Percoco v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
The Court granted cert. in the handgun “straw purchase” case, Abramski v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:44 pm
., to have review granted by the California Supreme Court -- there's a strong tendency to write an expansive missive on the subject. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:06 pm
See Trump v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 11:00 am
Along the way, we have some interesting holdings.The case is Fernandez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:34 am
See Webster v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:30 am
The Appellant was granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Indeed, the kind of Norwich Pharmacal order sought by the plaintiff in Muwema had been granted in the High Court in London as long ago as 2008 (see Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)) and was recently granted in Nova Scotia in Olsen v Facebook 2016 NSSC 155 (CanLII) (17 June 2016)). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
The Supreme Court also revisited the decision in Cambridge Gas Transportation Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings Plc [2006] UKPC 26. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 7:32 am
’ ” Chafin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
On November 19, 2010, Pennsylvania Superior Court granted a petition for en banc reargument in Barrick v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:58 pm
The appellate court saw it differently stating that: We sympathize with the trial judge who, having presided over two jury trials and a prolonged Kelly hearing amid two appeals, was called upon to make the difficult decision of whether to grant yet another new trial in a case that was then almost 20 years old." [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:19 pm
This means that the names of those who signed the anti-gay rights petition may continue to be disclosed by the state. [read post]
