Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 6041 - 6060 of 10,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2022, 5:21 am by SHG
It was appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which affirmed 2-1, which decision was subsequently withdrawn and replaced with a 2-1 decision by Judge James Ho reversing the district court. [read post]
4 May 2008, 6:18 pm
The authors examined the CFOs’ equity incentives in three settings where prior research had demonstrated an association between CEOs’ equity incentives and earnings management, namely (1) accruals; (2) the likelihood of beating earnings benchmarks; and (3) the likelihood of restatements.Based on their analysis, the authors conclude that “because CFOs are primarily responsible for preparing the financial statements, the impact of their equity incentives… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Human Dignity, Journal of Hate Studies, Vol. 16(1) (2020): 1–11, Raphael Cohen-Almagor, University of Hull. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
The stay does not apply to the other two rules and does not extend the compliance deadlines for any of the four rules. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
At the time of the Lipitor litigation, Sonal Singh was an epidemiologist and Assistant Professor of Medicine, at the Johns Hopkins University. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:01 am by Patrick Hulme
John McCain sponsored a resolution approving the move. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
This conflict is primarily due to the latest round of the salary wars, wherein the hiking of associate salaries by one firm is quickly matched by others, until all the large firms are paying the same increased salary to maintain their recruiting competitiveness and lower attrition levels. [1]  This past year alone, two such hikes have occurred in the larger law firms and their markets, when typically they are spread out over a much longer time period. [2] In fact, the… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am by JB
In the next sections of this blog post, I explain (1) why his historical arguments are anything but clear, and indeed, on occasion, somewhat suspect; and (2) why many of his claims are beside the point, because they are based on views about constitutional interpretation that I do not hold. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Accordingly, the “animus” rationale does not look like a narrow basis for invalidating Prop 8. [read post]