Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
§ 125.18(b)(2)(v). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
And in reliance of its determination, the court principally cited to the case of Kirsh v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
And in reliance of its determination, the court principally cited to the case of Kirsh v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:19 pm
Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated opinion in a trademark case directed to what it means for a trademark to be generic, and hence not subject to registration, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel or the intermediate standard set by Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
V. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:46 pm
See Radwan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
He cites Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:54 am
Stanford Law Professor Bernadette MeylerPrecedent was thought to be important on several different levels in the June Medical Services case. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:26 am
United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:21 pm
Ultimately, the Supreme Court affirmed the Commonwealth Court’s holding that the retroactivity of the Protz decision dates back to the date of the IRE in the context of a worker’s compensation matter.After reviewing the prior Pennsylvania caselaw on the retroactivity of new law under the circumstances presented in this matter, the Court held that, unless the appellate decision rendering the new law specifically states that it is to be applied prospectively, the new rule of… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:42 pm
The court’s decision comes just days before the rule’s June 30 compliance date (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
" State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
See National Association of Wheat Growers et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
(Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
